This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
It would be helpful to know the issues in order to address them. Tomeasy T C 16:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't referenced, has POV issues, has notability issues, needs cleanup, needs to be improved to meet Wikipedia standards, and about five other things. Enigmamessage 16:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you see further limitations, mention them. It will help other editors to contribute in a constructive way. It's always a good idea to be specific, when one sees shortcomings. Wikipedia knows the nice To-Do tool, but that might be overkill for this stub-like article. Tomeasy T C 16:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I could tag it with all the relevant tags, but as a courtesy, I condensed them into one. If I added all the tags, you'd barely be able to see the article for the tags. Enigmamessage 16:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that your initial tag without a single hint on the talk page as to what you object does not help anyone. The few you mentioned is of course already enough to start with. I can only suggest this, but for myself I find it a good policy to give at least one specific to any generic tag I add. Otherwise, I find them only disturbing. Tomeasy T C 16:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Next time you create an article that needs to be tagged, I'll try to remember to add all the tags instead of condensing them. :) Enigmamessage 16:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.
BTW, is referencing still a problem? Which statement sounds POV? Tomeasy T C 16:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Referencing looks fine now. The second half of it is POV. "Gaethgens was a leading proponent of the country-wide introduction of tuition fees at German universities. It was for this reason that he was heavily criticized by the public. ) On November 2, 2005, during the last year of his tenure,[2] this criticism culminated in an attack by four protesting students who smashed two cakes in his face amid a plenary session at the University of Tübingen.[3]" Enigmamessage 17:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I agree to the first sentence you quoted. "leading proponent" needs to be backed up by sources or removed. The second sentence, however, isn't that mere quoting of facts? Tomeasy T C 18:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
