Talk:Pauropoda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blind?[edit]

The article says both that pauropods are blind, and that they are "shy of light". It can't really be both, can it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlFink (talkcontribs) 14:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which names of orders?[edit]

The lead paragraph and taxobox are not consistent with the text with respect to the order-level circumscription of the class. Pauropodina or Hexamerocerata & Tetramerocerata? The latter two are what Ruggiero et al use, which seems like a good default choice. DCDuring (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As Col, Tol, and Wikispecies uses the latter, I am changing the lead. Stikkyy (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Stikkyy. For reference, the most recent and authoritative taxonomic sources are probably found in the following:
    • Scheller, Ulf (2008). "A reclassification of the Pauropoda (Myriapoda)". International Journal of Myriapodology. 1 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1163/187525408X316730.
    • Scheller, Ulf (2011). "Pauropoda". In Minelli, Alessandro (ed.). Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda. Vol. 1. Brill. ISBN 90-04-15611-9.
    • Minelli, Alessandro (2011). "Class Chilopoda, Class Symphyla and Class Pauropoda. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness" (PDF). Zootaxa. 3148: 157–158. (an outline).
--Animalparty! (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]