Talk:Party Sequence

Pink Floyd Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect was a past project collaboration.

To-do list:

Fair use

Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use).
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).

Articles

Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
See COTM for monthly collabs.

Project building

Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages.
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Songs

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Genre[edit]

I chaged the genre from Psychedelic rock to Progressive folk, like these sources say http://www.pinkfloydonline.com/discography/more/ and http://monkeybastardsv20.blogspot.com/2009/01/pink-floyd-lost-years_14.html What the others of wikipedians think? --Italodal (talk) 18:57, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a bad choice. Furthermore, blogs are not reliable sources. Instead of just quoting what bloggers think, you should be stating why you think the existing genre is wrong or inadequate. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 00:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to change the genre of this music. This song is progressive, but its lack of elements of rock, so it can't be classified as Progressive rock. This song is too folk (it uses Tin Whistle) and I suggest to put Progressive folk in the genre. What do you guys think?--Italodal (talk) 22:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer we use recognized genre names. Some people have created articles for every combination of adjectives they can think of, but that doesn't mean there is any such recognized genre called "progressive folk", and we should avoid that term. I think "rock" is flexible enough to include this track, so I'm in favour of the current genre. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 09:17, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]