Talk:Parrot Jungle Island

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Miami High‑importance

	This redirect is part of WikiProject Miami, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the Miami metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.MiamiWikipedia:WikiProject MiamiTemplate:WikiProject MiamiMiami articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed probable copyvio material[edit]

The majority of this article was word-for-word from [1]. I removed the copy, and left only what was not copied from that site. The images may be a problem, as well. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 01:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed one of the images, I don't know about the other image though. --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just managed to backtrack the photo to [2]. I don't think the image is free, and I see nothing to support the contention that the orangutan in the picture is the one from the Parrot Jungle. I'll remove the image from the article and go tag it as a possible copyvio. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 02:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

There is no need to maintain two stub articles. Any information about the Parrot Jungle prior to its move to Watson Island should go in the History section of the Parrot Jungle Island article. -- Donald Albury 10:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that would be the way to go. There could be info & pics of the old jungle in a history section, although shouldn't Pinecrest Gardens have an article, since it's a currently operating historical park? - Marc Averette 13:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would work, as long as there are reliable sources for it. -- Donald Albury 14:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]