Talk:Parco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Procedural close, nothing to merge, merely a move request, see below.

Formal request has been received to merge: PARCO into Parco (this); dated: February 21, 2021. Proposer's Rationale: Merge PARCO into Parco, and then move that to Parco (disambiguation) for consistency. Also, the Japanese retailer on that list is always stylized as PARCO, can that article name be fixed as well? I had attempted a move to a disambiguation page myself, but had not been able to find the article Parco (retailer) and didn't have the chance to make one myself yet at the time, so it was reverted as I only knew of the retailer (which didn't seem to have an article) to add in addition to the group that PARCO currently links to. Londonbeat41692 . Discuss here. NOTE BENE: This proposal also involves a round-robin move and merge (see move proposal below). This is a package deal. GenQuest "scribble" 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 22 February 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

ParcoParco (disambiguation) – See the above. Note: Existing Disambiguation page (a redirect to this article) will require a move or a delete to enact. (See merge proposal above). This is a package deal. GenQuest "scribble" 05:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose as contrary to WP:AT (we don't add "(disambiguation)" if not needed). -- P 1 9 9   14:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • What are you going to do with the basename than? Per views Parco (retailer) might be primary[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Base name can stay as is. Not such overwhelming primary meaning to warrant a change at this time. -- P 1 9 9   17:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Have to agree with P199 on this. Not enough evidence at this time to suggest PARCO is basename or that the retailer (Parco (retailer)) would be the primary name. GenQuest "scribble" 16:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.