Talk:Panta bhat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Review[edit]

Can we have some feedback or reviews here? Aditya(talkcontribs) 13:36, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the name of the article should be Panta Ilish and should solely emphasize that dish. Panta bhat, individually, is not a major dish. --Kmzayeem (talk) 10:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't really matter what you think to that end, because a lot many reliable sources see panta bhaat as a dish, and a very major dish at that. Since you have taken an interest, are there any serious observations or comments that you can make? Aditya(talkcontribs) 03:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Aditya Kabir: The lead could be expanded to incorporate popularity, nutrition and health. That is what it says in the MOS 'to briefly include all sections'. TheMagikCow (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Aditya(talkcontribs) 21:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Panta bhat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. Link rot had set in before url was archived. Worldbruce (talk) 05:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:54, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]