Talk:Panchetgarh

India: West Bengal / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Normally Just Panchet?[edit]

While I was curious to find some more information on this village information is limited. I believe this is in the subdistrict of Potashpur - II and often referred to as just Panchet. If that is the case, there were 735 households containing 3,570 people in the 2001 census (1,805 male; 1,765 female).[1] I'm pretty certain that this is correct but I cannot say for sure so I'm putting the information here in hopes that someone with better knowledge can decide. Here is a mention of Panchet as a Gram panchayat on the Midnapur administration page. [2]Ando228 (talk) 19:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why the information frpm www.conati.info deleted???How do i put a pic of the palace and a few kings on the page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnyji 2k (talk • contribs) 19:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I recently checked that my original article on Panchetgarh (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panchetgarh) has been removed by user:Noommos sighting copyright violation as (WP:COPYVIO of http://www.contai.info/movements3.php)

The Panchetgarh page on Wikipedia was first created by me in 2008 based on some research done on the history of the place: (cur | prev) 16:28, 5 March 2008‎ Siddharthadas (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (994 bytes) (+994)‎ . . (Added content for Panchetgarh)

Can you point me at the source which you think has the same phrases as my original article and the date of the same. But it may be noted that I had put the facts together in Wikipedia for the purpose of information and I had not taken any steps to copywrite the same. If some other website took the information from my article and copywrited the same then I dont believe its plagarism on my part.

Request you to look into the matter and act on what you consider is correct. Also please provide me with the website where the same phrases as my article is used and the date of creation of the website as well for my information.

Thanks and Regards, Siddhartha Das email: bablu.boy@gmail.com wikipedia user id: Siddharthadas --Siddharthadas (talk) 03:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Noom _talk ^stalk 01:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]