Talk:Over the Limit (2010)/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

A little too early

Don't u think its a little to early for this.--Steam Iron 13:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Maybe, I'm a little unsure but went a bit bold about it since I'd normally start two months before the event (which would be next Tuesday). -- Θaks ter 16:02, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Well if the two month mark is next Tuesday i say let stand then whats the point in deleting it just to re created it in six days.--Steam Iron 16:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

WWE Over the Limit

So, what's gonna happen to the Wild Card PPV? Doom Ultra Man (talk) 23:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

For what I've heard, WWE has scrapped the Wild Card PPV.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 23:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

OK. Doom Ultra Man (talk) 00:33, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

What are the stipulations of the main event matches? Daniel 5790 (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

dont know yet--Steam Iron 21:29, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

I'll watch for updates. Cheyenne Cigars (talk) 01:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Most probably World Heavyweight Championship - Jack Swagger (c) vs. The Big Show (#1 Contender).

request to lock article

People keep adding bogus matches to this article. It was kinda funny at first, but now it's just sad. Perhaps an admin should lock the article to prevent these silly edits? 41.132.229.210 (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Randy Orton vs Edge

WWE just released a statement saying that Randy Orton vs Edge has been confirmed for Over The Limit. Don't know how to modify the table but it should now be added to the card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weightchamp (talk • contribs) 23:51, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

World Heavyweight Championship

On the April 30th edition of Smackdown, Theodore Long introduced the Big Show as #1 Contender's to the title. So I think the match should be added to the card —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.28.86.132 (talk) 13:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

-The match was announced, but it was never stated it will be at Over the Limit. It most likely will be, but we have to wait until it is officially announced by a reliable source Mark handscombe (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

No source. 201.41.0.78 (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Time limits

There is no source, and no reason to believe that the matches will involve time limits. Please remove that sentence 71.238.130.137 (talk) 06:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

PPV Gimmick

From the looks of things to me this PPV is looking like it doesn't really have a gimmick to it, or am I missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Killa Koz (talk • contribs) 12:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Despite the rebranding, and promos including the word "innovative new pay per view"...the 'E has yet to say anything about a theme for this event. If there is one." -- TRTX ^{T / C} 21:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Promotional poster

Is this a real promotional poster? Danny Boy 420 (talk) 23:39, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Of course. Why shouldn't be?--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 23:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

What was wrong with the last one? Tropical Devastation (talk) 00:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

That is definitely not the right poster. It is clearly quoting ticket prices in pounds, not dollars, so clearly it is only for the UK market. The WWE is obviously going to use a different poster for their main market in the USA. --202.65.245.3 (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Just wondering the second poster that was being used (a close up of Edge) does anyone think that was the better of the 2. This current one seems a little too...I don't know just the other one seemed more dark and professional, it looked like a dvd cover as opposed to the current one which looks like a 12 year old made it on their computer? talk —Preceding undated comment added 07:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC).

Butt Rapage at the PPV?

Was there really butt rapage at the PPV last night? That's what it says in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.110.118 (talk) 02:32, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

I would like to know as well. 148.129.129.154 (talk) 16:50, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

It was vandalism, and has long since been reverted. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 10:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I am not convinced of this. 148.129.129.154 (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Either am I. I propose that an inquiry be made into the validity of the current article and the deleted edits. 72.83.110.118 (talk) 02:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

jericho and the miz?

it was shomiz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.146.210 (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind I thought it was vandalism sorry 97.100.146.210 (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)