Talk:Ouachita Hills College

Seventh-day Adventist Church Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Arkansas may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Historic Adventist[edit]

Is OHC Historic Adventist? I think it's debateable. Let's see some sources first before we make that assertion. Fountainviewkid 01:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Umm. Let's see, how do we define "historic adventist" again? Do you deny that they are conservative? Would you also argue with Generation of Youth for Christ's designation as "conservative/historic?" bW 01:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and No. There are certainly elements, but do say GYC or OHC are specifically "historic adventist" may possibly be a stretch. There's a difference between Conservative Adventist and Historic Adventist. Clifford Goldstein sees himself very much as former but certainly not the latter. Ted Wilson also incorporates elements of both, but not exclusively one. Fountainviewkid 01:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its the exact same thing, conservative adventism is just a semantically watered down version of historic adventism which is essentially the same thing. GYC is currently linked to historic adventism in-text, if GYC is conservative, OHC definitely is. Ted Wilson, Clifford Goldstein, Joe Crews, David Asscherick and Doug Batchelor are all historic adventists. bW 02:03, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to see some sources for Goldstein being "historic Adventist". Cite your sources. And Asscherick isn't necessarily either. His view on the nature of Christ contrasts with the view of the HA's (same with Goldstein). And no it's not the "exact same thing". There's a difference that extends beyond semantics. I'm sorry but Goldsein/Asscherik ≠ Hartland. Fountainviewkid 02:15, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goldstein believes in Ellen White, doesn't drink coffee, etc. Isn't that historic adventist? Hartland is irrelevant to this discussion, but if you must know, I don't see much difference between Hartland and Goldstein/Asscherick other than the fact that Hartland is wikt:consistent with its beliefs, while the others mentioned are anything but. Although I disagree with Hartland, I can respect them for staying consistent with their premises, etc. while I cannot say the same for some others. That is off topic, however, the point is, they share beliefs which make them conservative/historic at the core. bW 02:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but Wikipedia does not go by opinion. What you see or what "I" see is irrelevant to the debate. Believing in EGW and not drinking coffee is not the definition of Historic Adventist. Look it up if you must. Hartland is a much better fit and actually is classified as such in the article. I think you need to learn more of what HA actually is. Find some valid sources or references or else it's just POV. Fountainviewkid 02:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which is exactly why I said, "That is off topic, however.." see my other arguments here, and the policy references 20 other pages where you have brought this up. My position is unchanged. Stop wasting everyone's time by bringing this up over and over again at different articles. bW 02:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to add POV. Fountainviewkid 03:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! That was an excellent use of unfounded rhetoric. May I remind of WP:AGF, WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA? bW 03:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's POV, what can I say. Report me if you really feel the urge. I'm sure this is such a grievous sin. Come on, seriously? We have way more important things to do than bickering like this. Good luck on finals. Fountainviewkid 03:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mission Statement[edit]

Please do not remove portions of this article without first discussing on the Talk page. I noticed a new IP edited in the same vein as a previous disruptive and now blocked editor. --Fountainviewkid (talk) 12:48, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Campus OuachitaHillsCollege.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]