Talk:Organic unity

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definition is buried[edit]

This article hides the actual definition of what 'Organic unity' is somewhere well into the third sentence. It might be nice to refactor the page in such a way that the definition is more prominent and then the supporting material can occur later. 118.90.25.165 (talk) 06:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Reference.com article on organic unity is a copy of this article. All editors/bot operators: please be aware of this, so that the copyright issue doesn't rear its ugly head. Wikipedia is beginning to be cited by reputable websites all across the internet (c.f. DrugBank's inclusion of Wikipedia info). Fuzzform (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Says very little[edit]

Good grief, this is a horrendous article that disappears up its own entrails and says virtually nothing about Organic Unity itself! 91.108.91.165 (talk) 06:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable[edit]

This article should be tagged with a notation that it is not reliable and should not be cited. It is not [yet] up to the same standard as most other philosophical entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekachakra (talk • contribs) 13:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]