Talk:Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Charismatic Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Cultural Reference[edit]

South China Morning Post, The night of October forth 2019: People stocked up on food due to the riots. This note was added to a live running update of the riots.

8:13PM Oranges are the only fruit

A local supermarket in North Point is seeing longer than usual queues, while fresh vegetables are almost out of stock.

People are stocking up on frozen dumplings, instant noodles and bags of rice. (reference: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/politics/article/3031515/hong-kong-leader-carrie-lam-announce-introduction-anti-mask image: https://cdn.i-scmp.com/sites/default/files/styles/660w/public/d8/images/2019/10/04/veg.jpg?itok=E-vv0uIl)

(I just want to add that the Hong Kong legislature was elected and the DAB (pro-Beijing party) honestly got more votes this time. It is not out of love of Beijing, but a distaste for those fat cats who claim to support democracy. The election is not fully free and fair, but the so-called Democrats do not want reform that might vote them out of office.)

Acronym[edit]

What does WC stand for in the context of "WC evangelical church" it isn't clear from reading it and I doubt it stands for water closet. Could someone point out what it stands for, or perhaps replace the acronym for what it actually stands for? I've read the book itself but I still can't think of what it might stand for. And now I think about it I don't recall it saying what kind of church it is, I think it is only assumed?

dacey 14:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worldwide Church 194.207.86.26 (talk) 06:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

York Notes[edit]

Is it necessary to mention that there is a volume in the York Advanced Notes series by Kathryn Simpson in the very first paragraph? Sounds like a bit of a pitch to me. Mornington 19:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, but it looks like the second paragraph to me? I think it's there to assert the novel's notability. The JPS ^{talk to me} 21:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are we then to await the availability of Advanced York Notes as a sign of notability? In my opinion this is a trivial piece of information, probably fit for a footnote. But I suppose this is the sort of information which is practical. Shame. Mornington 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, but it helps, doesn't it. A footnote is not the best place, but feel free to move it further down under an appropriate subheading (critical reaction, etc.). The article is in a primitive shape and needs references anyway. The positioning of a pretty uncontroversial paragraph should not be high on the priority list. The JPS ^{talk to me} 20:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References in popular culture[edit]

Although Craig Ferguson on The Late Late Show mentioned the book in the context of closet lesbians, timed at 7:25 in this video [1], it was just in passing and does not seem significant, so I removed the reference that user:Bwhoback added for that mention. - Fayenatic (talk) 23:50, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131022124024/http://www.prixitalia.rai.it/2010/pdf/WINNERS_1949-2010.pdf to http://www.prixitalia.rai.it/2010/pdf/WINNERS_1949-2010.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]