Talk:Oppenheimer (film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oppenheimer (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2023, when it received 31,265,503 views. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 14 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Wiki Education assignment: Cold War Science[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 3 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nnorton94, Etch05, KBhodges24 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by StevenB1208 (talk) 23:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Plot abridging[edit]
the section "plot" isn't narrated in the same order the film is structured (which isn't cronological). Since the section is about the plot of the movie and not about the actual events, I think the section should be written as the movie goes. Chupafrutas (talk) 04:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
The "Summary" section under "Reception"[edit]
The "summary" section didn't feel written from a neutral point of view. It expresses opinions of whoever wrote this section, like "It does a great job" and "The film does not focus on every single event, but relays enough information to be understood." There are also a number of sentences that add no useful information, such as "Accuracy can be difficult to achieve in a film about a difficult and complex time in the world." and "It is important for Oppenheimer to be honest and truthful." In my opinion, this section feels tonally out of sync with the objectivity of the rest of the article, and I think it ought to be either heavily edited or removed, as most of the new information in the section fits well into other sections anyway. 2603:8000:D300:348B:8524:3799:F2F7:FD67 (talk) 16:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this comment. I've removed the section. It was added yesterday, and it looks like it was done as part of a school project. Furthermore, I suspect that it was written using a language model. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 50 Report
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report