Talk:OpenStreetMap/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

TierraWiki link

Can anyone see a good reason for having this in the "See Also" section? The project doesn't have the same aims as OSM (map the planet versus record some hiking trails), isn't open content licensed (and is therefore incompatible with OSM) and only has a single technical component in common (it uses GPX files).

There are TierraWiki external links on quite a few WP pages with only a tenuous connection -- are they link spammers, perhaps?

If no-one objects, I'll remove this link (again) in five days.

Jonobennett (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Why is an external link in the See also section, anyway? Lurker (said · done) 12:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I've removed it. There seem to be a lot of links to TierraWiki on Wikipedia, and their article was deleted twice. Lurker (said · done) 12:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

New licence for OSM?

"OpenStreetMap data is published using a Creative Commons 2.0 license. A new license is being prepared."

A CC license is ambiguous, that should state CC-SA 2.0 specifically, and does a new license is being prepared mean that the project is upgrading to CC-SA 3.0? --Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 16:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I added the ref from the lead to the section you meant, to clarify. As I'm not too much of an expert on Creative Commons, and don't really have the time to become one now, I'm sure that the licensing could use additional clarification.— Ewald ^{(talk|email|contrib)} 07:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Moved comment

how to create job in area choosing, i like to do this in my coutry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.79.47.148 (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Images on OSM

How are images added to streets on OSM?--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, this talk page is for discussing the article, not the subject in general (see WP:TALK#USE. Please ask on a suitable forum, such as http://help.openstreetmap.org/ . Sebastian (talk) 07:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Outdated header image?

The header image is old and should be replaced. The map style has changed massively since the header image was made (see [1]). 78.52.132.163 (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Done Hi, thanks for bringing it up. Assuming you meant the map of Cambridge in the infobox, I've updated it with a fresh one. I tried to capture the same area, though I didn't get the same zoom level. Please let me know if there are any issues with it, and in the future don't hesitate to rectify the situation yourself, All you have to do on the website is click the share menu and there are a bunch of options. Opencooper (talk) 22:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

location codes

does OpenStreetMap utilise/work with open geocode systems ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.99.149.191 (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, this talk page is for discussing the article, not the subject in general (see WP:TALK#USE. Please ask on a suitable forum, such as http://help.openstreetmap.org/ . Sebastian (talk) 09:31, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on OpenStreetMap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.