This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The castle is called Old Castle Lachlan as it refers to the seat of the clan Lachlan. See also the references used in the article itself. Therefore I would like to propose to change the name of the article. Any thoughts?
Kind regards, Otter (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am willing to go with the references. However one of the references refers to it is Castle Lachlan and the other as Lachlan Castle.QuintusPetillius (talk) 13:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the Historic Scotland reference? The legal document attached on their website states Castle Lachlan as well. On CANMORE the castle is also called Castle Lachlan (with Old Castle Lachlan as alternative title, and without Lachlan Castle) and the website of The Lachlan Trust refers to the castle in their care as Old Castle Lachlan. Kind regards, Otter (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]