Talk:OMG (Usher song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOMG (Usher song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed

Auto-Tune[edit]

Hi. I beg to differ that Usher is not using any auto-tune at all and that only will.i.am uses it on this song. And that reporters name is Edna GundersEn not Edna Gunderson --74.69.177.29 (talk) 04:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peak positions[edit]

the peak for omg in belgian singles chart(flanders) is 10 http://www.ultratop.be/nl/weekchart.asp?cat=s&year=2010&date=20100529

on belgian singles chart (wallonia) the peak is 29 on Czech Airplay Chart the peak is 51

on Dutch Mega Single Top 100 the peak is 39 http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Usher+feat%2E+will%2Ei%2Eam&titel=OMG&cat=s

on Swiss Singles Chartthe peak is 49 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.215.142.79 (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UK Charts[edit]

The UK charts reference link points to some other song page. Please fix it Novice7 (talk) 06:38, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Oh My Gosh vs. Oh My God...[edit]

I noticed in the 53rd Grammy Awards performance that Usher used "Oh My Gosh" instead of "Oh my God". Was this a censorship/sensibility issue with the network? Should it be mentioned in this article?Dreammaker182 (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, what he said is in the song. He definitely says "Oh My Gosh" in a portion of the verse and in the chorus, refer to the sample in the article. Candyo32 00:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy?[edit]

Just found [1], not sure how widely reported it was. Anyone else know of anything? Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:28, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also found [2] and [3]. Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ooooh. I remember a while back and IP kept trying to add that to the article but had no source. Idk or not, It really hasn't gotten much coverage. Scratch that, I guess the EW article makes it pretty notable. Candyo32 02:34, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll try to whip something up. Adabow (talk · contribs) 02:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on OMG (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:OMG_(Usher_song)&oldid=1202985165"