Talk:North American Sabreliner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:29, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

T-39 SabrelinerNorth American Sabreliner — I recommend that this article be moved and used as the start for a general article including both the civil and military variants, which have much overlapping content. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Add  # '''Support'''  or  # '''Oppose'''  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes[edit]

  1. Support - reason noted above. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 05:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - I agree that the civil versions need coverage, but doubt sufficent content exists to support two good articles. - BillCJ 05:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Well, presumably we would have to expand the existing content. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 06:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I assumed you planned too :) I do have some printed sources, but it may take me awhile to get to them. - BillCJ 06:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey - Oppose votes[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Add any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sabreliner as test bed[edit]

Rockwell Collins, a corporate descendant of North American Aviation, uses a Sabreliner 50 as a flying weather radar test bed. MWS (talk) 03:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sabreliner Wing Geometry[edit]

I have corrected the reference to the Sabreliner's wing geometry - the 'liner has a 35 degree sweep, and its wing is modeled on the F-86K 'long wing' Sabre (Air Enthusiast, 1972), and the same holds true for the tailplanes. The F-100 has a 65 degree sweep, and a thinner profile. Please discuss. User Deepshark5, 20th March 2008, 5:49 UTC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepshark5 (talkcontribs) 05:50, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One wonders if there is any credible reference, based on company records for instance, that states that the Sabreliner got its name because of, to quote this article, the "similarity of the wing and tail" to the F-86. One would more likely suspect that it was just a marketing or PR ploy to develop a brand association - Sabre, Super Sabre, Sabreliner, etc. - rather than a reasoned argument based on the borrowed engineering of the wing structure, etc. Jmdeur (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My thoughts exactly. With the public love affair with the Sabre and Super Sabre, NA would likely have called it "Sabreliner" to make sure everyone drew the connection and realized who built the thing. I don't think that would be the first time. I suspect the fact that the wing and tail were visually similar was just a handy excuse to toss to the press. Heck, it's possible that they decided to use a visually similar wing and tail specifically to make sure it "looked like a NA aircraft". It is funny how many design cues were repeated between the P-51 and the F-86, -86D and then the F-100. Perhaps it was simply because they thought that was what worked best, but MiG has used their distinctive "MiG Tail" on every jet they've designed for decades (and a similar one before that), and I've never heard that it was because they actually thought that it worked better than other shapes, but rather, it worked as well and was good PR. Anyway...


Idumea47b (talk) 05:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on North American Sabreliner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]