This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
(cur | prev) 19:33, 12 May 2012 Pengyanan (talk | contribs) m . . (6,767 bytes) (0) . . (Pengyanan moved page First North Americans (novels) to First North Americans: no same-name article exists. no need to add brackets for disambiguation) (undo | thank)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page not moved. There is no consensus for this move. (closed by page mover) -- Danetalk 18:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. There's no other article that would reasonably use the title. Indigenous peoples are rarely called "first North Americans". This article doesn't get that much traffic, so the number of people landing here who really want Indigenous peoples of the Americas must be tiny if not zero. Station1 (talk) 08:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Station1. A hatnote is in place for someone truly looking for the other topic, but it's not a common term for it. --Tavix(talk) 17:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – it is rare to call the indigenous people of North America as the "first North Americans" per Station1. The hatnote will solve confusion. CookieMonster755✉ 15:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The book articles are unreferenced and with no evidence of independent notability, so I support the 2017 proposal to merge here. Klbrain (talk) 06:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]