Talk:Non-human electoral candidates

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Morris the Cat reference[edit]

The reference given for Morris the Cat's US Presidential candidacy appears to be unrelated to Morris the Cat. Typometer (talk) 23:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fiscus Tree[edit]

Does anyone have a reference for the thing about Michael Moore and the fiscus tree? It might be good to add to the article (if only because people would he extremely amused by it).IMFromKathlene 06:10, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard about it through a friend, who saw it on TV at some point here in Austria. Adding it would be a good idea, but we need a source... —Nightstallion (?) 22:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can of foot powder elected mayor of Ecuadoran town[edit]

In 1975 Robert E. Ornstein published a book titled "Common Knowledge" with the headline as its subtitle. Such an item is technically not an animal, but seems to fit the spirit of this list. I can't find many details about the supposed election, but the New York Times reported the event on 7/17/69 and the incident is also recounted in the Write-in_candidate article. Asat 03:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I recall it from the news at the time, the basis was an avertisiment whose Spanish I cannot after all these years: "vote for whoever you want, but vote for Pulvapies," Pulvapies being the brand of foot powder. The name Pulvapies may help to track this rumor down. 71.175.133.100 (talk) 22:41, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

H'Angus the Monkey[edit]

Not a real animal, but surely deserves a mention here? 212.159.16.171 13:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the list now includes a ficus tree, a puppet, and possibly a can of foot powder, perhaps this page should be renamed "Non-human electoral candidates", or something of that sort — they all fit into the same basic spirit, animal or not. I'd agree that H'Angus should get a mention, anyway. -- Vardion 16:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move to Non-human electoral candidates. ProhibitOnions (T) 20:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Caligula's horse[edit]

The Roman emperor Caligula attempted to make his horse, Incitatus, a consul. Although he never was, Incitatus at least deserves some mention in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noz92 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Limberbutt McCubbins[edit]

The Limberbutt McCubbins campaign has continued to gather steam and have news articles, radio shows, and television appearances published. I believe his page should be reopened and not directed to this page. Here are but a few of the examples:

Robinweiss (talk) 20:26, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What happens if a great ape (non human) is elected[edit]

I saw a statement on the main page that things that is expected that a human must do might be able to be challenged, like if an oath is required, a challenge on the fact that by no choice of the chimp's own it is mute, at least non speaking. Does anyone know of any examples of where an animal, especially a great ape, was elected in an official public office (excluding the mayor of unincorporated X place), and if so, what happened next? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.156.139 (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Non-human electoral candidates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Non-human electoral candidates. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-sections[edit]

I have created some sub-sections, since many of these were not actual candidates. It's not always clear if the nomination procedure was followed, if the nom was accepted, if the entity appeared on the ballot, if they could hav taken up the post had they won.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:13, 9 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Non-human_electoral_candidates&oldid=1212503971"