Q3: The article's sources have a left-wing bias, or are otherwise unreliable. If Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, shouldn't the sources used in the article be more balanced?
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.
Nick Fuentes is classified as a neo nazi in some of the sourced articles in the page and has associated with other neo Nazis, such as Richard Spencer. He seems eligible for the category. Firekong1 (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 March 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
The sentence saying “The FBI began an investigation as to whether any of this money went toward the financing of illegal acts, such as the storming of the U.S. Capitol,” should be changed. Fuentes himself never did anything illegal and never went into the capital. He has stated that he told others to not go in as well. Fuentes was not charged or prosecuted for anything that happened on January 6th.
Similarly, the sentence “ Although he did not enter the building, he allegedly shouted encouragement for the rioters to "keep moving towards the Capitol" and that they were "taking the Capitol back,” should be changed. There is no proof he said this, the ADl is merely speculating. Fuentes himself has claimed he did not tell others to go in. Fuentes has also never spread misinformation about Covid, everything he has concretely claimed has been proven correct. 45.23.111.209 (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 April 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under political views > Catholic integralism and Christian nationalism, in the second paragraph, change “Fuentes has described himself is a reactionary who supports” to “Fuentes has described himself as a reactionary who supports” Smurr7 (talk) 06:43, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @GorillaWarfare: I reverted revert because you removed good content due to your own biases (which is evident in your professional history). I added facts - reinstatement on X (formerly known as Twitter) and also added a more neutral introduction, while still giving space to the criticism. As I reverted, I added notes as I was able. --domesticenginerd 15:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted far more than the single edit you've identified (and as Muboshgu has pointed out, you inappropriately used rollback to do so). Can you clarify whether your concern is specifically with this revert or with the three other edits I made? And can you please elaborate on this "your own biases (which is evident in your professional history)" comment? Thanks, GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) No, you are watering down sourced content, and now making value judgments on contributors rather than sticking to content. You should stop edit warring right now and only make changes with consensus to do so. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I am requesting that the image shown for Nick Fuentes be changed. It is currently a low quality screenshot. There is an image photographed by Nicole Hester of Fuentes at a rally, which seems to me as a better image to portray the subject.
Done – thanks for your suggestion. Zenomonoz (talk) 03:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the edit due to the image in question being ripped straight from the article it sourced, which does not license the image under Public Domain. @Heatyeet, I recommend you look into WP:IUP and image licensing guidelines before uploading images to the project. @Zenomonoz, I understand that you were just trying to fulfill the request but please make sure to double-check images submitted in edit requests to ensure whether they fit copyright guidelines or not. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry I would never have approved that change had I checked. Thanks. Zenomonoz (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What can I do to get the image licensed properly? Heatyeet (talk) 17:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Get the owner of the license to agree to release it to the public domain. If it's a photo from a major agency like Getty or AP, that won't happen. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is by an independent photographer by the name of Nicole Hester. How can I get her to release it? Heatyeet (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Reach out to her directly to request that she release it via creative commons. If she agrees, great. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Heatyeet Chances are, you are not going to be able to get agency or independent photographers to freely license the images they take for journalists. I recommend looking at this page for general licensing guidelines for Wikimedia Commons. B3251 (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Done – thanks for your suggestion. Zenomonoz (talk) 03:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)