Talk:New Zealand fairy tern

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested moves[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved by Materialscientist. --BDD (talk) 18:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– Invert the redirections as the consensus and guidelines recommend not to capitalise the common (vernacular) names of species. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Animals, plants, and other organisms. Coreyemotela (talk) 09:12, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, finally. If this is proceeding according to some category-walking patterns, be it taxonomic or geographical, that seems like a good idea. And who's taking on the downcasing in the actual article text? There's talk elsewhere of using bots or AWB scripts to move a lot of these articles and decapitalize within them, but I suspect there are a lot of devils in the details, and the work might as well get started manually while they figure those out. A deeper question is how many of these are at IOC names that are not actually the WP:COMMONNAMEs, and thus need a different kind of move, for article titling policy reasons.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:09, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy support and close as per consensus. Red Slash 01:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • COMMENT - I don't think there is yet a true consensus on the issue of capitalization for bird articles. A lot depends on where you have been discussing the issue. Look at WT:BIRDS and the consensus is to leave them capitalized. Look at MOS and the consensus is to not capitalize. One page is the haunt of subject matter experts, the other the haunt of Stylization experts. Both groups are convinced that their view has consensus. That said, I am leaning towards opposing the moves... on the grounds that while overall source usage is mixed, the majority of sources on the higher end of the reliability scale all seem to capitalize. Blueboar (talk) 20:37, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY Pages were moved by Materialscientist (talk · contribs). Coreyemotela (talk) 17:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Zealand fairy tern. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:New_Zealand_fairy_tern&oldid=1204271092"