Talk:Neverwinter Nights: Hordes of the Underdark

Point of view, etc.

The entire article needs to be rewritten. As it is, it's basically a game guide, which according to WP:NOT means that it can be subject to deletion. I tried to make it at least third person, though it's a pretty cruddy job. --PresN 22:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

I always struggle in deciding exactly where the line is drawn between being a guide and being encyclopedic. Clearly some information has to be given and if you check out articles like Baldur's Gate II or Planescape: Torment you will see that there are large amounts of information which would clearly indicate it is more like a guide. However... I think the content of those articles is invaluable despite it being like a guide because it gives an insight into the games and an explaination of the features you will find. Still... where you draw this line I am not 100% definate about. Enigmatical 22:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Date functionality is broken

WP:MOSDATE; note: using [200x in video gaming] BREAKS date functionality where day/month/year are being used. User DATE preferences will not work properly. Schmiteye 03:06, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Ever heard of contrast? How about resolution?

The screenshot should be removed. It barely qualifies as a screenshot, since it's impossible to see what it is, beyond being a tiny black rectangle with some heterogeneous blobs in it. --76.224.105.9 21:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

clean-up needed

This article need works to amount to anything encyclopaedic. For example, the reception section's reference is a mere user-opinion on a game-site; see WP:SPS. It needs to be removed and replaced with a reliable source, etc... --Jack Merridew 06:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Who the f*** is this "Andrew Parker" guy, and why does his opinion matter? 92.11.26.229 (talk) 02:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)