Talk:Natural Law (Star Trek: Voyager)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:ST-VOY 7 22.jpg[edit]

Image:ST-VOY 7 22.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too long?[edit]

Too long? Come on. Lots42 (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary and unreferenced tag on article - and probably needs a notibilty tag also[edit]

To write a correct article on fiction that contains a plot summary, the best thing for editors to do is read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Overall the message is that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and articles must be encyclopedic in nature. An article that is just a plot summary is not considered encyclopedic.

Specifically, plot summaries are discussed here WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. The article should also justify the notability of the episode per Wikipedia's veritibilty policty Regards, –Mattisse (Talk) 20:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]