Talk:Nash Rambler

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nash and Nissan badges[edit]

I am curious, the Nash badge resembles the present Nissan badge. Is there any link at all, or is it just coincidence?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.38.64.93 (talk • contribs) on 16:42, 2 February 2007.

There was no relationship between these automakers, in their marketing, nor badge designs. CZmarlin (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Putting inflation calculator back in[edit]

There's a reason for Wikipedia's inflation calculator. It exists so it can be used, to explain what a price actually was in the past. There was no legitimate reason for it to be removed.Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 15:49, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of the reclining front seats?[edit]

Front seats that reclined back to a point where they could be a bed was for many years what the Nash Rambler was famous (and infamous) for.

Here's a picture and some details about it. Not really a good solid source though.

There kind of HAS to be something more out there about it. Probably you'd see more mentions of it during the 70s than back in the 50s/60s. Magazines didn't want to be TOO suggestive in the 1950s. TimBRoy (talk) 15:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]