Talk:Nanoor massacre

missing info

Isn't there something missing between sections background and the next section's first (called massacre) sentence after the massacre...? I was hoping to learn about the massacre, something about what happened... instead some say those who were killed were dacoits. How strange. --Ben ^T/_C 10:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Categories

In a weird move to 'promote' this article, User:Ghanadar galpa seeks to mass categorize. Let's have a look at the cases where I dispute the categorization he does:

• Category:Political repressions in India: Repression is the act of a state, it is not an act of a political parties, even though that party might hold regional government power
• Category:West Bengal], is a supercat of Category:History of West Bengal
• Category:Economy of India, this is not within the bounds of economy, even with a very wide definition of the term economy
• Category:Political and cultural purges, 'purge' is not a synonym for 'killing'. Nothing in the article justifies this categorization.

--Soman (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

CPI(M)'s viewpoint

available at [1]. This should be incorporated in the article somehow. --Soman (talk) 22:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

There is nothing about Nanoor in it. It is a general view of land reforms, which can form a separate article. - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 02:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

""Hence, the violence in Midanpore. Since there was no dearth of licensed arms with Trinamul supporters, funded by these affluent landlords, they went on a rampage, displacing thousands of workers from villages. They began returning after two and a half years. What happened in Nanoor in July? It was a fight between farmers and landlords desperate to recapture land," he remarked." --Soman (talk) 09:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Added - P.K.Niyogi (talk) 11:32, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nanoor massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080430031704/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=35824&usrsess=1 to http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=35824&usrsess=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)