Talk:Nanoindentation

Not totally sure on what exactly happened with the companies, but the Nano indenter(tm) II was produced by Nano instruments, Inc, P.O. Box 14211 Knoxville, Tennessee 37914 and I seem to recall them being bought out by MTS which is why they now own the continuous stiffness system and their special lock in amplifier they use to drive said system.

Also note that you don't get "different" hardness values. Both indentation techniques (nano and macro) are the same basically, it's just that a typical macro intendation is calibrated to indent and back out the the hardness at the maximal load applied, whereas some of the nano systems use a method by which they can back out this same hardness value while performing the indentation.

It depends on how you calculate the indentation, whether you use a projected area or consider the elastic recovery. This could give you a different 'hardness'. Also, as microhardness values give Vickers hardness values, this can also give you a 'different' value, as the geometry/load will measure a different 'hardness'. - BenBritton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.84.73 (talk) 17:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Nano Indenters

To answer previous post, the NanoIndenter II was produced by Nano Instruments in Oak Ridge. NANO instruments was bought by MTS in 1995 then sold to Agilent technologies in 2008. Their main product is the Nanoindenter XP. They are still considered the leader in NanoIndentation especially since they count Dr Warren Oliver (Oliver and Pharr model) in their staff. PMOREL

projected contact area for Martens hardness?

I think the use of the projected contact area for calculating the Martens hardness HM is not correct. According to ISO 14577 the area As must be used: HM = Pmax / As However, Ap is used for the Indentation hardness: H_IT = Pmax / Ap Dont mix up these two area and two hardness definitions! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.63.51.151 (talk) 07:21, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nanoindentation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120516191242/http://www.technion.ac.il/~merittel/all_papers_pdf/elastic_indentation.pdf to http://www.technion.ac.il/~merittel/all_papers_pdf/elastic_indentation.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Nanoindentation Instrument.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)