Talk:NGC 404

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image by Odd Trondal[edit]

I don't really see the purpose of "NGC 404 by Odd Trondal" - it doesn't really add anything to the article (it basically looks the same as the main picture by the Hubble) and only clutters up all the text around it. I suggest it be removed KingMunch (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't entirely agree. The Hubble image has a very restricted field of view, while Trondal's image shows the glow of Mirach and gives a better idea of what the galaxy would look like in a smaller scope. Moving it to a gallery was the right choice. -- Elphion (talk) 14:08, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NGC 404. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible satellite galaxy found[edit]

https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04741

Accepted for publication but not published yet.©Geni (talk) 07:51, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]