Talk:NGC 1052-DF2

counter arguments[edit]

Papers making counter arguments can be found at:

©Geni (talk) 06:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And that's we we have policies like WP:TOOSOON and requirements for multiple independent sources. Lithopsian (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Through peer review http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aac216 ©Geni (talk) 21:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add another, more recent one: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.11612. GregorB (talk) 12:06, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is now a third option although need to wait for peer review: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10283 ©Geni (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested distance[edit]

An IP is repeatedly blanking the sourced content about the re-evaluation of the galaxy's distance [1]. I've asked IP twice to discuss it here. Meters (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They appear to be referencing https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aada4d which should probably be mentioned.©Geni (talk) 06:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]