While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
I really think this should be deleted because it lacks an encyclopedic tone -- it makes it seem like the article is persuading or otherwise trying to send a message (which, as a person who is queer, i would support, except it's lacking NPOV) that should be put in the description of the crime itself. Does that make sense? I hope that makes sense. I dunno. The list formatting really isn't working for me here. Anyone else feel that?
I agree that it's a somewhat confused section. The link given is dead, but here is the original Courier article should any other editor want to revisit the section and rewrite it for inclusion again. Keri (talk) 18:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
