Talk:Murcanyo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Term[edit]

"The burde proof rests on anyone making the original change", considering that you made the orginal change (see here, from "Bedouin" in the source to "inhabitance") the need to provide proof to dispute the edit is on you. However, you brought nothing other than WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH which isn't accepted here. Even then, my statements and that of Middayexpress are already supported by the original source. In fact, other sources agree as well. AcidSnow (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As for this, it's quite clear that it's west of the Arabian Sea, hence why it's "facing" it. So there really was no need to remove it. Also please come to the Talk Page. AcidSnow (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about. Miles indeed clearly indicates Bedouins [1] [2]. However, with regard to Ras Hafun, British Institute in Eastern Africa is the actual proper name [3]. Middayexpress (talk) 18:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I pointed that out but they don't care. My bad on the Institutes name, I thought it was discussing location. AcidSnow (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requested[edit]

There are actually two articles on this town. This article (Murcanyo) and Bandar Murcaayo. So they should either be merged into one article or one of the articles should be deleted. Considering that Bandar Murcaayo has a few interwiki links while Murcanyo has none, I suggest to summarize the available info in an article called Bandar Murcaayo. Loranchet (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Al information shared is Fake Bye ([[User talk:

Bursaalax122|talk]]) 21:25 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Page needs protection[edit]

@Isaidnoway we can work finding protection for this page I put more efforts to research and make good editorial for this page but surely there is people who also changing information Muscab30 (talk) 04:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page needs protection[edit]

@Isaidnoway we can work finding protection for this page I put more efforts to research and make good editorial for this page but surely there is people who also changing information Muscab30 (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Achmad Rachmani there people who always changing and editing this page could we keep eyes reverting this page or we can putt protection Muscab30 (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MusikBot II this page experienced dramatic changes there's high vandalism it's possible to put it pp-extended protection to keep the important information of this page Muscab30 (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]