Talk:Mudgee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Location of Mudgee[edit]

The article begins by saying that Mudgee is in eastern NSW. Although that is logical enough in one way if you simply look at a map, most people in NSW would not describe it in that way, so it is potentially confusing. A more usual description would be say that it is in the Central West of NSW, so unless anyone has strong objections I shall change it to reflect that. Ondewelle (talk) 19:15, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have changed the location in the opening sentence to "the central west of New South Wales". Ondewelle (talk) 12:59, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No gold found in Mudgee?[edit]

The article states "While no gold was found in Mudgee itself" which may not be entirely correct. According to http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/48613193 "Men digging the site for a new hospital at Mudgee have struck gold, only three or four feet below the surface. However, the gold is not plentiful enough to sell at a profit. An old miner made the first strike three weeks ago, and other workers have since found quartz and gold dust." According to Bonzle.com this was known as the Lawson Creek Mine. There was also an underground mine (Derale Gold Mine) which according to Ozexplorer waypoints and Bonzle.com appears to have been located in the vicinity of Duoro St around the Flirtation Hill/Mudgee Showground area. I cannot find any production records relating to this mine and Minview (NSW Trade & Investment Resources & Energy) says it was a vein occurance of size occurance only. According to Ozexplorer waypoints and Bonzle.com two other gold mines were also located on the outskirts of Mudgee. The Gaoi Open Cut Mine (placer occurance size occurance only), which appears to have been located somewhere behind where Bunnings is now situated, and the Lawsons Paddock Open Cut Mine (placer occurance size occurance only) located near the junction of Lawson Creek and the Cudgegong River. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.140.149.58 (talk) 23:51, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://genealogy.wikicities.com/wiki/James_Blackman_(1754-1842)
    Triggered by \bwikicities\.com\b on the global blacklist
  • http://genealogy.wikicities.com/wiki/John_Blackman_(1795-1867)
    Triggered by \bwikicities\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:57, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced the blacklist URL. Kerry (talk) 02:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blackman family[edit]

While fixing the blacklisted link, I went looking for references in relation to James/John Blackman. The more references I find the more confused I become about who is who in the Blackman family. There was a James Blackman, who had a numbers of sons including James junior and John (and others), all of whom seem to have been pioneers in the district. A number of sources are unclear which Blackman is being talked about and some seem to attribute various claims to different family members. If anyone knows Mudgee history, I'd welcome input on who's who! Kerry (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mudgee/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The first sentence under 'Early history to 1850' looks odd. Mov326 02:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 02:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Corrected grammar and added local lore and observations.120.156.4.123 (talk) 04:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mudgee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]