Talk:Monza ampullae

A fact from Monza ampullae appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Monza ampullae are metal pilgrimage souvenirs from the Holy Land, dating to circa AD 600, and important in art history for their iconography?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unused refs[edit]

Oxford history, souvenirs [1]
[2]
Noga-Banai [3]
[4]
er
pilgrim badges
Crook -oil [5]
Irish cross
19th C[6]
Lowrie C19[7]
Baert, Preedy, Berlin etc [8]
Kean images (4) [9]
Nees, "engaged" [10]
Good women at the tomb [11]
Sacred silver [12]

Monza ampullae image online[edit]

While researching André Grabar, I came across a thesis online that includes as its Figure 21 a nice reproduction of a photo from his book Ampoules de Saint Terre. (Grabar, André, and Denise Fourmont. Ampoules de Terre Sainte (Monza, Bobbio). Paris: C. Klincksieck, 1958.) Is this image of antique art copyright or could we reproduce it in Wikipedia? There is no image of an ampulla in our article. betsythedevine (talk) 21:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'll copy this to the article talk page. All the images are good & many others somewhat relevant (the Vatican box reliquary fig 22 especially - I think it is mentioned in the text). I won't add to further reading as the subject is somewhat tangential & it is only an MA thesis. But some may find it worth a look. Figs 21-22 are nearly the last pages. The photo is 3-D so almost certainly copyright (Bridgeman-Corel does not apply). We have links to other online images in the notes at various places, & I'll work this one in later. Johnbod (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, 3 links added in notes. It is probably the best pic linked to. They are actually dark little things - there was a group in an exhibition in London (RA Byzantine) a year or two ago that were so badly lit you literally could not see them at all - how I wished I'd brought a torch (plus one would have needed to kneel). Johnbod (talk) 14:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Monza ampullae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]