Talk:Monocrotophos

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monocrotophos article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technical language[edit]

Apologies if as a guest I'm posting in error, but I found the highly technical language in this article cumbersome. Would a contributor who's familiar with the subject be willing to rewrite? --173.166.61.113 (talk) 13:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Structural formula[edit]

I made a new drawing of the 2D-molecular structure today, because the old one wasn't correct; see discussion there.--Spiperon (talk) 04:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions[edit]

This article has a "conclusion" section. Wikipedia articles generally do not have conclusions as they tend to violate WP:NPOV. Wapondaponda (talk) 15:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was because the text had been copied directly from a pesticide advice factsheet. Keri (talk) 10:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

The information in the artcle appears well-researched, but very little of it is to be found in the 3 references listed, with # 3 containing news not (yet) in the artcle. Are there references awaiting entry or something? Thanks! Janice Byer, Delaware, USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janbyer (talk • contribs) 02:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The references for the text were included on the original website from which the text was directly copied. The original plagiarist was too lazy to copy them over, however. On the plus side, this did help determine which came first: the WP page or the external website! Keri (talk) 11:00, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

The majority of the article was made up of text copied directly from this website by User:172.188.56.157 in 2007. It has been removed. Keri (talk) 10:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]