Talk:Money flow index

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening heading[edit]

I disagree with this: << obviously there's never any net money in or out, because for every buyer there's a seller of the same amount >>

Suppose there is 1 share of stock for an entire company, if that stock was purchased in the past for $10 and then was sold for $9 then you could say that $1 has flowed "out" of that stock. So I don't agree that there is never any net money in or out because that stock had some value and that value was exchanged for a different price. So, I agree in the idea of money flowing into and out of a stock.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Money Flow IndexMoney flow index

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support – the majority of the first 20 google books hits use lower case, so it's nowhere near the MOS:CAPS criterion for a proper noun. Dicklyon (talk) 23:04, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.