Talk:Monarchism in Georgia

	Georgia (country) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (country), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Georgia and Georgians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (country)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (country)Template:WikiProject Georgia (country)Georgia (country) articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I suggest changing the title to Monarchy in Georgia- far better English. JohnC (talk) 00:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JohnC I see your point but if it were that it would express the Idea that a monarchy exists I think a better title is needed though. Nate Riley 19:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The poll asking about support was online therefore it did not say ask use a poll say for example 45% men 55% women because that is the nummber of men to women as well there are sub-clans or groups in Georgia and if the Monarchy is from one of the smaller groups monarch would have less support because of this at least the different %s of the clans should have been taken into account as well if many people from Russia, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia voted they likely would vote anti-monarchy or not that I can see the other choices I am speaking about online polls (not that I know what that is since the link is down) lastly If it were simply monarchy many would vote no since that would include no democracy but Constitutional Monarchy may get many more votes. I think it should be removed simply for these reason and the link is dead. -- Nate Riley 19:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration not technically impossible[edit]

There are arguments for and against a restoration. But to say that "skeptics say the restoration of the monarchy is technically impossible due to several reasons including the number of candidates and an unsettled question of succession to the Georgian throne" is confusing political opposition with whether it is technically possible. The succession may be disputed, but that cannot be said to make a restoration "technically impossible". It is not unusual for succession to thrones to be disputed.101.98.74.13 (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Thanks for pointing out this important distinction. FactStraight (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Monarchism in Georgia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]