Talk:Moire (fabric)

A fact from Moire (fabric) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that grosgrain ribbons or textiles finished by calendering become the thin, glossy and papery fabric known as moire (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/July.

Wikipedia

Textile Arts Mid‑importance

	Clothing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Textile Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of textile arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Textile ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject Textile ArtsTemplate:WikiProject Textile ArtsTextile Arts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Materials Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Comments[edit]

What about Moiré pattern? Isn't this duplicative? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.35.50 (talk) 02:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not. - PKM (talk)

Watered silk[edit]

I think watered silk should probably be folded into this article and made a redirect here. Thoughts? - PKM (talk) 03:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This merge has been completed. - PKM (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely agree. With regards to Issues or Concerns addresses via any Wiki Talk Page, has the idea arisen to remove the Comments, as is the case here? It now just seems impertinent, especially since there is now a Linkback, resolving the concern altogether. Please advise, thank you. Mark Halsey 15:43, 8 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markhalsey (talk • contribs)