Talk:Moab (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 30 January 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 16:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moab (disambiguation) → Moab
Moab → Moab (ancient kingdom)

– The article currently at Moab is not a clear primary topic, Moab, Utah is just as well-known, if not more so. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 14:37, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Not it's not. Srnec (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose More hits for Moab in Utah than I expected through a brief google, but most still referred to the kingdom and the kingdom page receives over double the daily page views. CMD (talk) 11:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Google is different for everyone, but when I look it up in an incognito window, the top results are two vacation planning sites for Moab, UT, then Wikipedia's page on Moab, UT, then a bunch of images of Moab, UT, and then the Moab page. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 14:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning oppose; the historical usage is primary by significance. BD2412 T 04:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No no no - long-term historical significance. WP:NWFCTM looms large here. Red Slash 22:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The ancient kingdom is primary (at this capitalisation) by page views and long-term significance. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.