Talk:Ministry of Finance (India)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.finmin.nic.in/the_ministry/dept_eco_affairs/dea.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:01, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doctors of an autonomous body under the dept. of AYUSH are deprived more than 25 years without promotion or Dynamic ACP[edit]

We are Indians and we have enough faith on our parliamentary system but when we observed that some Homeopathic doctors of National Institute of homoeopathy are deprived more than 25 years without a single promotoion or Dymic ACP recommended by 5th and 6th Central pay Commision our thought become changed.This is an autonomous organisation under the Ministry of Health and F.W, Dept. of AYUSH.This department has its own order by which Delhi Municipal Commission and some States health service alredy implemented the Dynamic ACP for their AYUSH doctors but Dept. of AYUSH ignoring the fact to implement this process in national Institute of Homeopathy, Kolkata.Doctors are working in the post of Medical officers and Assistant Research Officers for more than 25 years and some of them already retired from service after giving service sincerely without a single promotion or Dynamic ACP.thereis no promotional avenue for them.Central Health Service alredy implemented Dynamic ACP for isolated post.So it is regrate to say that one Govt. employee retiring from service without service benifi.Nobody bother about it. Still they are waiting for this Dynamic ACP. In this Circumstances if Finance Ministry look into this matter sympathetically then they will be grateful to our finance Ministry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.176.182 (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DACP of Medical Doctors working more than 25 years in National Institute of Homeopathy, Kolkata[edit]

This an appeal to our Finance Ministry to consider the fact of some unlucky doctors working in National Institute of Homeopathy more than 25 years without any promotion. there is clear direction of 5th and 6th CPC as well as DOPT to implement DACP for medical doctor who has not avail any type of promotion.This DACP already implemented in Central Health service. It is our firm belief that only Finance ministry can solve the matter other wise they will suffer till their retirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.69.57 (talk) 15:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal[edit]

I propose to merge Minister of Finance (India) into this article since both talk about same and there is not enough content to separate them. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:00, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Capankajsmilyo: I am going to merge the Minister of Finance (India) into Ministry of Finance (India) as per your proposal. Between editwars and reverts I assume the merger tags from both articles have vanished. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:29, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Dharmadhyaksha: -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted this merger per my comments at a similar article: '(1) Not just a "list" at all, rather a large and complex table. (2) The Ministry's article should focus on its history, activities and organisational structure; adding a huge table of ministers' names will distract from this. (3) There should be separate articles for ministers of state and for defence secretaries; do you propose to merge into this article as well? (4) It's standard practice on Wikipedia to have separate articles for the ministry and the list of ministers, both for Indian articles and other countries.'—indopug (talk) 08:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ministry of Finance (India). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

continuation of Senior Citizen Saving Scheme. for life[edit]

To the minister of finance,

Why there is cap of 5 years and then renewal of next three years only for senior citizen . If a senior citizen takes the scheme at the age of 60 years . Then he can avail only upto 68 Years . Where as if he lives longer he has no saving scheme supporting him for balance year he is alive. In other words he can go to Hell if he lives longer. Funny, Govt. must make it applicable till he is alive. One can put a clause of providing living certificate for him. Please look into and remove this flaw from the scheme. Actually all schemes applicable for senior citizens should be for Life. I am sure the ministry will look into it passionately. Rgds, Mukesh Chandra Goel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.72.243 (talk) 05:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]