Talk:Minarets of Al-Aqsa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Title change[edit]

I suggest that we change the title of the article to either "Minarets of Masjid al-Aqsa" or "Minarets of Haram al-Sharif". Although historically known as the Temple Mount, the current structure is actually a mosque complex. And the people adding the minaret structures were adding them to a mosque not the Temple Mount. Moughera (talk) 03:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Minarets of the Temple Mount. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 July 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Minarets of the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound. No such user (talk) 11:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Minarets of the Temple MountMinarets of the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound – Opening this to discuss the comment above by Moughera in 2019. I created this article in 2016, but on reflection my choice of title does seem odd. Onceinawhile (talk) 06:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support The Minarets are the Minarets of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, calling them minarets of the hill that mosque happens to be on is awkward and unnecessary. 2601:405:4400:9420:50B5:BD47:2846:F0B (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as above: they are there because of the Al-Aqsa Mosque; not the Temple mound, Huldra (talk) 23:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Yup, they're for the mosque so makes sense. R Prazeres (talk) 05:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This may be a sensitive issue, but at they are Muslim buildings we should refer to them by their Muslim title. PatGallacher (talk) 23:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Note about revisions[edit]

Just a general note here that I've made some heavy revisions to some parts of the article ([1]). I initially meant to copy-edit language and style issues, but found numerous contradictions, unsourced details, misunderstandings of the sources, WP:OR that filled-in details that weren't in the sources, and so on. I've even revised the headings and general spelling of the names to reflect what most English sources use (per the sources consulted so far), rather than uncommon transliterations or unnecessary attempted translations. I tried tagging remaining issues relating to sources or citations, but there are probably other (hopefully minor) things that will need further clean-up.

It would have been too complicated to explain all these in my edit summaries, so if there are any follow-up questions, I would welcome them here. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 18:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]