Talk:Milton Keynes City Council

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buckinghamshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Places to do business citation[edit]

Is in the 'Centre for Cities' report, if someone else has time to do it. I don't at the moment. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A handy link to search the Centres for Cities website for MK content for anyone else wanting to dig further. FriendlyGeek (talk) 08:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unitary authority event?[edit]

The article doesn't say when or how Unitary Authority status happened. Would someone who knows about such things please rectify? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My thanks to whoever updated the article with that info. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scandal or controversy[edit]

The barrister's opinion that planning conditions were missed as a result of "human error", there was "no untoward conduct." says pretty clearly to me that the word "scandal" is not appropriate. Had he found corruption or "gross dereliction of duty", then "scandal" would indeed be appropriate. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JMF That's a fair point to make. I initially thought that "scandal" sounded better because "controversy" sounded like a personifying term to me. Although I'm sure many of the residents certainly view it as a scandal, hence the local election results in the Newport Pagnell South Ward. Anonymous MK2006 (talk) 11:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Next' local elections in 2026?[edit]

Previous text: "The next election is due to be held in 2026." (Amended on 6th May from '2024').

My update: "The next local elections are due to be held in 2026 when, due to changes in the electoral ward boundaries, all council seats will be up for election. "

As well as the text change I've added a source about the 2026 local elections ward boundary changes and clarified that they are local elections (I felt this could be clearer), however I cannot find a source stating that 2026 will be the next local elections (i.e. that none are planned for 2025). Can anyone find a source confirming this? FriendlyGeek (talk) 08:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]