Talk:Mills Novelty Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeMills Novelty Company was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

All right here is my review. The article needs some work, but I think it can make it. First of all the history section contains alot of WP:PROSELINE. I would like it if that would go. Second, you need some more sources especially in the "Mills Violano-Virtuoso" section. The trivia section has to be incorporated and not on its own. You might want to include a little more info as well. I no it is a lot, but this is what needs to be done. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 23:21, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Upon closer look, you were right to request all the changes. I will not be able to make all of them. However,
the history section contains alot of WP:PROSELINE - I did a little to move the family section out, but thats about it.
you need some more sources especially in the "Mills Violano-Virtuoso" section - You are correct. Someone will get to it, but not me not now.
The trivia section has to be incorporated.  Done
You might want to include a little more info. - Could help, but again nmnn.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NOTICE - I will post this on the WP:CHICOTW discussion board and hope someone wants to take over from here. Please give us our full seven days.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 00:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As agreed I gave you a extra two days from my initial review to make up for the time you did not see the article's review. There is still a lot of proseline, and a fair amount of unsourced info. Unfortunately, I have to fail it. Sorry. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Mills Novelty Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mills Novelty Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mills_Novelty_Company&oldid=1209072098"