Talk:Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


hangon[edit]

Give me a few minutes to see what I can turn up. ornis (t) 06:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Newsweek article
  • Huffington post about discrimination againsts atheists in the military in general in foxholes generally, but cites MAAF.
  • Also mentioned on the Colbert report ( still looking for a good link )
  • Held a rally in DC on veteran's day 05. [1]
  • aholes of the week mention of christian officer who disrupted a MAAF meeting in iraq.
I have withdrawn my request for speedy deletion as the subject seems relatively notable now (it cited no references when I saw it and appeared to be an ad). Thank you for your contributions. --RucasHost 07:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for not deleting the page. I have made an extensive update and will be posting it soon. Hope you like it. Frederick Green (talk) 01:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization[edit]

What does everyone think about adding this article to the category Category:Religion in the military?

Obviously the organization exists for atheists, but it is in a way an aspect of religion in the military, along the lines of "Hey military religious people - Not everyone in the military is religious."

Any thoughts on this? KConWiki (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is a valid idea. Go for it. Frederick Green (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree. Aethists are by definition non religious, so placing them in a religious category seems wrong on both sides of the argument. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military Association of Atheists & Freethinkers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]