Talk:Michael W. Ryan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. ÷seresin 08:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Michael W. RyanMichael W. Ryan (murderer) — move this article to a new page so that this page "Michael W. Ryan" can be a disambiguation page for other people of the same name. —Pikapika7777 (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. As far as I can tell, no one else at Michael Ryan has 'W.' as a middle initial, so there's no need to disambiguate. Hqb (talk) 17:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above, there doesn't seem to be anyone else named Michael W. Ryan. Maybe add a hatlink to the Michael Ryan disambiguation page though. TJ Spyke 17:42, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Circlesquaretriangle incorrectly tried to move this page in order to disambiguate from ZNS, whose real name is Michael William Ryan. But disambiguation is for similar page titles. A hatnote to ZNS is more appropriate. --Mysdaao talk 17:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Hatnote added. Incidentally, the proposed title would be confusing as against Michael Ryan (mass murderer). Tevildo (talk) 22:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright violation[edit]

I just removed a good chunk of the article that turned out to be an exact copy of an article that can be found here:

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2015/05/26/michael-ryan-leader-anti-semitic-cult-passed-away-prison

Neither was the section properly sourced, nor does its style fit that of an encyclopedia. As it stands, this is a copyright violation and I removed it from the page to keep Wikipedia free from legal harm. The source itself is highly inappropriate for such a high-caliber case for which proper primary sources should be used. 217.51.177.143 (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]