Talk:Michael Lipton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Michael Lipton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kusma (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Ktin (talk). Self-nominated at 18:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Michael Lipton; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • For me the hook is interesting so I will give you a little leeway on the time. So before you started expanding on 23 April I make it a bit under 200 words and when you finished on 6 May almost 900 words so that is fine at more than 5 times expanded.
  • So the Guardian says "Michael also showed that in land-scarce situations, poor farmers managed the land more intensively and more efficiently than richer ones". Was that the quote you wanted to cite? If so we should maybe adjust the hook slightly.
  • Checked Earwig no copyvio.
  • Who's Who 2014 is showing as a possible unreliable source. Do we actually need this?
  • Cite 1 does not actually show he was research prof until this year - please could you check and adjust
  • Not essential - but you could use the trans-title parameter for the Spanish paper
  • Thanks much @Chidgk1:. I will try to get some time this week and will address these items. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 02:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • QPQ completed. Coming back to the other items next. Ktin (talk) 04:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed Who's who 2014 and validated the new ref 1 showing professorial fellow from 1967-1994, and research professor from 1994 onwards. Ktin (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apologies, did not follow the Spanist trans-text comment. Please can you help? Ktin (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • hope google got it right
  • Re: the Guardian comment, yes, that is accurate. The requisite section from the Guardian article is Michael also showed that in land-scarce situations, poor farmers managed the land more intensively and more efficiently than richer ones; and he debunked the idea that poor farmers were wasteful, showing that grain losses on farms were often minimal.
  • @Chidgk1: With the above edits, I will hand this back to you. Thanks for your review. Ktin (talk) 20:38, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go thanks