Michael Kremer is currently an Economics and business good article nominee. Nominated by RegMonkey (talk) at 20:55, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)
Short description: American economist and Nobel laureate (born 1964)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Kremer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Effective Altruism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relevant to effective altruism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Effective AltruismWikipedia:WikiProject Effective AltruismTemplate:WikiProject Effective AltruismEffective Altruism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Michael Kremer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Michael Kremer'sO-ring theory of economic development was inspired by the economist forgetting to purchase toilet paper for one of his educational non-profit's training sessions? Source: Monaghan, Peter (March 3, 2000). "Of Elephants and O-Rings: an Economist's Unusual Views on Ivory, Taxes, and Population". Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved November 20, 2023.
Overall: Article has appeared in ITN before. I will try checking if it was a BOLD link or if it was non-BOLD link. If it was a BOLD link, I think unfortunately, this might not be eligible. Alright. Just checked. Unfortunately, this nomination might not be eligible for DYK because it was posted on ITN as a BOLD link. Relevant discussion can be seen here. I am going to keep this nomination open for sometime in case the nominator thinks I might have gotten this wrong. It is a shame because I liked the hook. Nice work on the article though. Good luck on the GA nomination. Ktin (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Marking no on this nomination. I will continue to watch this nomination in case someone wants to message me in regards to this nomination. Ktin (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ktin:WP:DYKNEW says, "It (an article) is also ineligible if it has, within the year prior to nomination or between nomination and appearance on the Main Page, appeared as a boldlink at In the news (ITN)" This article appeared at ITN in 2019, so I think this article is still eligible. Z1720 (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720: - Wow. Thanks! Was this a recent change? Irrespective, this is good to go then. Unrelated, Earwig's check indicates a few high % matches, but these are largely publication names etc that are being tied back to Kremer's CV and a quote. I think this is good to go. Marking approved. Ktin (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]