Talk:Michèle Fitoussi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Restoration of unsourced material is being treated as simple vandalism[edit]

This has to stop. If it's "sourceable", then source it. Otherwise, restoration of unsourced material is vandalism, it's as simple as that. UnitAnode 17:03, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That kind of comment is not worthy of a response. Please don't delete verifiable content on your novel pet theories about sourcing methods. - Wikidemon (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not insert unverified content after it has been removed. Either source it, or leave it out. ++Lar: t/c 18:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, no. That is not how Wikipedia works. You are an administrator. Please deal with abusive behavior here, and stop throwing your weight around to advance your content position. - Wikidemon (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Policy is clear. Removing unsourced material is allowed, in fact encouraged. REinserting it after removal is disruptive. I'm not sure it's all the way to "abusive" unless it's a repeated pattern of behavior. That's not "throwing weight around", nor is it "advancing a content position". I think you are much mistaken but this is not the place to debate the general case. ++Lar: t/c 22:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]