Talk:Messier 54

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move all. —Wknight94 (talk) 23:16, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

Discussion[edit]

Please discuss this move at Talk:Globular Cluster M2.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not the first extragalactic globular cluster[edit]

As early as 1932, Edwin Hubble discovered 140 extragalactic globular clusters around the Andromeda Galaxy.[1] I think the author meant that M54 is the first former 'Galactic Globular Cluster' correctly recognized to belong to a dwarf galaxy orbiting our Galaxy. --Diamonddavej (talk) 01:34, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Several globular clusters in the Large and Small Magnellic Clouds as well as in the Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal were discovered in the 19th century are in the NGC catalogue. I don't know when they first associated with their host galaxies though but at least before the 1950s (e.g. Gascoigne & Kron 1952[2]). Korandder (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Radius[edit]

What is the source of the radius quoted in the info box? Also what sort of radius is it? Core, half-light, tidal or some other one? Korandder (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers dont add up[edit]

Figures on the SagDEG article place it at 70,000 LY from Earth, with a diameter of 10,000 LY, with "M54 apparently at its core". Yet this article here M54 gives a distance on 87,000 LY, which would put it well beyond the core.

This comment also made on the SagDEG article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:E448:D401:E8BE:3E5F:C4C2:ACB9 (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]