Talk:Messengers 2: The Scarecrow

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Not a Prequel[edit]

Messengers 2: The Scarecrow is always misrepresented as a prequel when it is not. Todd Farmer has been quoted in interviews more than once that Messengers 2 is his original story (See ^[1]) and that The Messengers is a re-written adaptation of that story; they are in to way related directly to each other and merely share a common character with a completely different story arc in each film. I would think in the interest of accuracy that this should be noted along with all prequel references removed on both pages.Malagant (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since The Messengers came out before it, and this story is about the events that occured prior to the original, then this serves as a prequel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.55.170.113 (talk) 04:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should not be called a prequel as the events in this movie do not correspond easily with the events in the first movie; I would imagine that if they do correlate, there would be more ghosts in the first film than those who appeared.Twizzar (talk) 00:18, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.fearnet.com/news/b14310_todd_farmer_writes_us_bloody_valentine.html

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Messengers 2: The Scarecrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090401193901/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11012 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.fearnet.com/news/b14310_todd_farmer_writes_us_bloody_valentine.html

[1]