Talk:Merkur Scorpio

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merkur Scorpio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100902103657/http://media.ford.com/plant_display.cfm?plant_id=134 to http://media.ford.com/plant_display.cfm?plant_id=134

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Ford Scorpio[edit]

I am proposing this article be merged into Ford Scorpio. I don't believe the Merkur version is different enough from the Ford to warrant it's own article, not to mention that this article is short, not very well written and doesn't contain enough unique information that it can't be covered in the main Scorpio article. It already has a section for the Merkur and I think that's all this coverage this model really needs. Reattacollector (talk) (via public computer). 64.85.150.114 (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as per nom, Mr.choppers | ✎ 00:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose While I agree that this article is worthy of its start-class rating, the Ford Scorpio article has what it needs on this vehicle already and is not in need of any expansion (as does the Merkur parent article). While less extensively modified than the XR4Ti, the Scorpio was also re-engineered for North American use (part of the reason leading to its demise); this article is just in need of attention. --SteveCof00 (talk) 07:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I think the car is notable in itself due to being marketed in a different country by a different division of the company, with substantial re-engineering and changes to trim. Although underneath it is the same car as the Granada-Scorpio, in the eyes of the consumer it is not seen that way. One Of Seven Billion (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what's more hilarious, the allegiation (in the intro) that the Scorpio was developed for Merkur, or that it's anything but a Ford Scorpio, rebadged and adapted to different regulations. Substantial re-engineering did not happen. Anyone of a different opinion may of course feel free to edit the article accordingly. With sources, of course. That would be highly informative. Also, Sierra floorpan or not, lengthening wasn't all that happened, as the Scorpio is a substantially wider vehicle. Track's ca. +4/5". All that notwithstanding, this issue can do with a merger. So far, nothing says it's anything but a re-badge. Sorry, Billion. --G-41614 (talk) 13:30, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]