Talk:Melaleuca leucadendra

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Melaleuca leucadendra is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cajeput [sic] tree[edit]

M. leucadendra does occur in parts of Southeast Asia but Melaleuca cajuputi is more widespread and is probably the species that is used to produce cajuput oil and known as Cajuputi or the Cajuput tree. The Burke's Backyard link is dead and the Hong Kong street tree article does not mention Cajeput or Cajuput. I propose to remove the reference to Cajeput because it is misapplied to Melaleuca leucadendra. Melaleuca cajuputi is the cajuput tree or cajuputi.

I hope the author of this note is happy with the revision of 13 May 2015. Gderrin (talk) 09:38, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Melaleuca leucadendra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

urls for JCA and SGAP fixed Gderrin (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]