Talk:Mehmed Handžić/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vice regent (talk · contribs) 00:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OakMapping, I'll take this article and review it in the next few days.VR _talk 00:14, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I smell trouble here - the article lack section about his career as imam, if he was imam, what mosque he lead, and so on. Or if not, he must have been something in this context, some kind of priest, on some kind of position, in some religious institution.--౪ Santa ౪^99° 21:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Santasa99: the article doesn't say he was an imam, but rather an Islamic scholar and theologian and details for that are described in Mehmed Handžić#Academic career.VR _talk 06:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment — Is this article still being reviewed? There seem to be no progress here. Is the review somewhere else? —Remember, I'murmate — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 18:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I did read the article a couple of times but forgot to review it. I'll try do finish it in a week. Sorry for the delay.VR _talk 05:06, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Status query[edit]

Where does this review stand? VR hasn't started reviewing after three months, while OakMapping doesn't appear to have edited on Wikipedia in a month and a half. OakMapping has been waiting since the article was nominated in late October, which is a long time to wait. On the other hand, there hasn't been anything done to address the comment Santasa99 made. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been about a month since I posted the above, and four months since the review was first opened, yet Vice regent has yet to start the review. Since this has been abandoned, I am putting this back into the pool of unreviewed nominations, in the hopes that a new reviewer will come along. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:30, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]